SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEAL-WILEY AGREEMENT FOR OPEN ACCESS
Source: Jobmann, A. (2019). Meaning and opportunities of the DEAL-Wiley contract for the open access transformation. OA2020-de.org. Available at: https://oa2020.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/en/blog/2019/03/18/meaning_opportunities_wileydeal_openaccesstransformation/
Open access transformation means the most comprehensive possible transformation of the scholarly publishing system to open access.
Numerous measures and actors are contributing to this transformation.
The transformation is fuelled by its implementation in practice with clear objectives.
Open Access Transformation
Open access transformation means the most comprehensive possible transformation of the scholarly publishing system to open access. This implies moving away from the traditional subscription and acquisitions model whereby libraries pay for access to scholarly works. Although current efforts are focused on scholarly journals, a complete transformation of the scholarly publishing system to open access presupposes the inclusion of all publication types. Moreover, all regions of the world must also be included
At EU level and in Germany, respectively, the open access transformation has for some time been an established policy goal of the European Commission, the Federal Government – and also of state governments (see Policy Frameworks), scientific organisations, and research funding organisations (see Research Funders and Open Access).
The development is dynamic and is shaped by numerous approaches and actors. However, criticism has been voiced from various perspectives. Some publishers and professional associations, for example, have pushed for deceleration or exceptions. Other stakeholders have drawn attention to possibly unintended consequences of the transformative approaches. These include a further strengthening of the position of major publishers, possible lock-in effects, or a further increase in article processing charges (APCs), which are already too high. Scholar-led initiatives have expressed the wish that publication infrastructures be placed in the hands of the scientific institutions themselves. In addition to the desire for open access to scientific research, they take a critical view of the scholarly publishing system and have put alternative standards for research evaluation on the agenda.
Source: Philipp Zumstein. (2023, September 29). Der Weg ist nicht das Ziel: Über Ideale und Irrwege bei der Open-Access-Transformation. Open-Access-Tage 2023 (OAT23), Berlin. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388502
Instruments for the Transformation
The basis of many transformative approaches is the reallocation of acquisitions funds. The underlying idea is that no additional funds are needed, but rather the current (global) funds can be used for open access publications. To be able to implement this, publishers must be encouraged to convert their publications to open access models. By converting existing publications to open access, publishers can take the acquired reputation and experiences with them.
Transformative agreements, where some of the content of subscription journals is published open access and the expectation is that this proportion will gradually increase to 100%, are currently the instrument that is attracting the most attention and has had the greatest open access effects. However, it is not always clear whether such a transformation will be achieved in a binding way (see, e.g., Mittermaier, 2021, 2025; Rothfritz et al., 2024). The German initiative Projekt DEAL (now Konsortium DEAL; see below) is a key player in the field of transformative agreements. The hope is that with these transformative agreements a critical threshold will be exceeded, above which the publishers will convert their entire portfolios to open access.
In addition, individual journals can be established as transformative journals with the clear goal of steadily increasing the share of open access content (see Plan S).
For individual journals, the complete and immediate conversion to open access – so-called journal flipping – is the quickest transformation option. Depending on the position the publisher takes, and on who owns the title rights, the flipped journal can continue under the same name, or the editors can be withdrawn, and the journal can start anew at a different location.
Starting open access publications from scratch means that new journals, book series, or conference proceedings are planned as open access products from the very beginning.
These instruments are driven by various actors and supported by them over and above providing extensive publication funding:
Research performing organisations support this process by operating publishing services, university presses, journal platforms, etc. These offerings are non-commercial and may even be subsidised if the organisation covers the operating costs, thereby reducing cost pressure and increasing scientific control.
On the one hand, research funders provide financial support with publication charges for open access articles and monographs. On the other hand, through their open access mandates (or – weaker – expectations), they support authors’ decisions to publish their works open access. Furthermore, several programmes are funding projects dedicated to creating infrastructure for the open access transformation.
Libraries negotiate all kinds of open access agreements, carry out publication and cost monitoring, and develop new open access models. They are increasingly using acquisitions funds for open access (see German Library Statistics and the Open Access Monitor). Procedures are put in place to monitor the transformation to open access in accordance with institutional and statutory provisions and the compliance with open access policies.
Libraries and commercial actors operate consortia or jointly fund open access publications.
Open access repositories serve as venues for the self-archiving of contributions in parallel with publication (see green open access), thereby enabling authors to meet research funders’ requirements with regard to open access (see also Plan S and the Rights Retention Strategy).
As is the case in almost all other aspects of the open access debate, scholarly journals are also dominant in the transformation context. In principle, all instruments are also applicable to books and book series as well as other types of publications, such as conference proceedings. However, in individual cases, new complexities arise. Thus, all actors are called upon to include all publication types in their open access transformation measures.
Although various transformation approaches can be applied in parallel, they occasionally also collide. This happens especially in the case of scarce resources or strategic orientations. Whereas transformative agreements focus more on large bundles or entities (large journal packages, large publishers), approaches such as journal flipping tend to emphasize aspects such as scientific control or a complete and immediate transformation to open access. One challenge faced by all approaches is the constant search for sustainable funding opportunities that follow on from and further develop the existing acquisitions structures (see Schenke et al., 2025).
Consequences of the Transformation
The main consequence of the open access transformation is the growing share of freely available and possibly reusable scholarly literature (see Arguments and Reservations).
Within research performing organisations, the open access transformation is changing work steps and responsibilities, and there may be a need to redistribute financial resources. The background for this is that the costs of scholarly publishing are increasingly distributed based on publication output rather than purely on the size of the research performing organisations.
New tasks are arising, especially for scholarly libraries. Here, acquisitions funds must be reallocated, the development of the publication figures must be monitored, and financial support must be made available for publication costs and consortial funding models. In addition, transformative agreements must be managed, and some tasks must be redistributed among publishers, libraries, and authors. Depending on the organisation, the libraries are responsible for advising researchers on open access publishing. Thus, open access has developed from a special topic to a core task of libraries.
In recent years, the Digital Information initiative of the Alliance of Science Organisations (Alliance Initiative for short) has published several position papers on the open access transformation (especially Bruch et al., 2016). The key demands are the anchoring of open access in the libraries, in licensing practice, and in the acquisitions budgets; the gradual reallocation of acquisitions funds; the disclosure of journal subscription costs and open access publication charges and figures; and the development of scalable processes in the libraries. In 2024, the Alliance Initiative published a study on the mapping and description of open access services in Germany (Biela et al., 2024) that reflects the status quo of publicly funded scholarly open access services and infrastructures in Germany
The German Research Foundation (DFG) is a key science policy actor in the open access transformation. It supports the development and operation of open access publication funds and infrastructures with several funding programmes and thus significantly influences developments in these areas. In its positions on research policy, the DFG supports key initiatives such as the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, OA2020, the Action Plan for Diamond Open Access, the EU Council Conclusions on Scholarly Publishing 2023, and the International Science Council (ISC). It also cooperates with other national and international open access initiatives. Although it supports the efforts of cOAlition S, the DFG does not mandate open access publishing. In two position papers (DFG, 2018; DFG, 2022), it has taken a stance on current challenges in academic publishing
In 2022, the German Science and Humanities Council (Wissenschaftsrat) published comprehensive “Recommendations on the Transformation of Academic Publishing: Towards Open Access” in which it declared that the goal of the transformation was for gold open access to become standard practice for the publication of scientific results. To monitor publication costs and strategically plan the funding of academic publishing in the long term, the Council recommended that scientific institutions establish information budgets.
Projekt DEAL, now known as the DEAL Konsortium, was initiated by the Alliance of German Science Organisations under the leadership of the German Rectors’ Conference with the aim of concluding uniform national licence agreements for all (digital) journals of major commercial academic publishers. The agreements that the DEAL Konsortium concludes on behalf of over 900 eligible institutions have an open access component : Authors affiliated with participating institutions can publish their works open access in the publishers’ subscription-based journals with an open access option (so-called hybrid journals) at no cost to themselves (hence the high proportion of open access publications among the research articles from German institutions). In addition, participating institutions have access to the publisher’s entire journal portfolio. The publication fees are invoiced centrally to the publishers’ contractual partner, DEAL Open Access Services (DEAS) gGmbH, which in turn invoices the participating institutions. To date, DEAL agreements have been concluded with three publishers: Wiley, Springer Nature, and Elsevier.
Forum 13+ was established as an independent working group of experts from German library consortia to coordinate the negotiation of transformative agreements between scientific institutions and small and medium publishers or professional associations – beyond the realm of the major scholarly publishers with whom DEAL transformative agreements have been concluded. In this capacity, the working group has published a guide to the assessment of open access transformative agreements and publishers’ offerings (“Bewertung von Open-Access-Transformationsverträgen und Verlagsangeboten”).
Plan S is an initiative of an international consortium of research performing and research funding organisations (cOAlition S). Since 2021, cOAlitionS has been calling for scholarly publications from publicly funded research to be published in recognized open access journals or on open access platforms or to be made immediately available through open access repositories without an embargo. Joint implementation guidelines are implemented in the funding guidelines of the participating research funders. One key element is a fundamental rejection of hybrid open access, except as part of discernible transformative arrangements. cOAlitionS attaches great importance to cost transparency on the part of publishers. Thus, it reflects the general trend that research funders currently have the most effective and simplest instruments: by linking awards of third-party funding to open access obligations, they can intervene decisively. However, German research funding organisations are not officially members of cOAlitionS.
SCOAP³ – Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics is an international consortium under the leadership of CERN that is dedicated to the promotion of open access in high-energy physics (HEP). It is a globally unique initiative that has converted several key journals in the field of HEP completely to open access without authors having to pay the article processing charges (APCs) themselves. Libraries and organisations from all other the world contribute financially to the project. The level of contributions is based on the publication output of the respective scientific institutions.
As a consortial model, KOALA enables sustainable funding for diamond open access. Scientific institutions – especially libraries and research performing organisations – jointly fund journals, which can then switch to a diamond open access model: Thematically focused journal bundles are offered to scientific insitutions for community funding. As soon as the funding target has been reached, the journal is funded for 3 years and is made completely freely accessible. Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology University Library (TIB) in Hanover acts as a central service provider and coordinates the KOALA model as part of its regular operations.
Professional associations are self-organizing bodies that also set professional standards. Some of them have signed the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, discussed the topic of open access internally (see Bärwollf et al., 2023), or taken a science policy stance on the open access transformation – as, for example, the German Physical Society (DPG) did in a position paper (DPG, 2021) in which it expressed criticism of certain developments in the area of open access.
Besides institutional actors, the researchers themselves have a key role to play in shaping the open access transformation. By choosing an open access publication organ and model, using their secondary publication right, and making their publications available under an open content licence, they can make a decisive contribution to the free accessibility of their research results. Moreover, researchers can set up an open access journal themselves, convert an existing journal to open access (journal flipping), or get involved in scholar-led diamond open access initiatives.
Open Access Transformation in Practice
What the many different approaches to the open access transformation have in common is the aim that in future the largest possible share of scholarly publications will be freely available. To be able to assess the measures and develop them further, they should be as transparent as possible. This includes the provision of information on possible intermediate steps on the path to complete transformation to open access (especially in the case of transformative agreements), the anchoring of irreversible steps to increase the share of open access publications, and transparency regarding the underlying publication figures (information budget). Cost-cutting mechanisms should be incorporated to prevent a further increase in article processing charges (APCs).
The creation of a network of actors should be aimed for, without fundamentally limiting the diversity of the options. However, new initiatives would be well advised to obtain advice and support. The project open-access.network offers opportunities for networking and individual advice.
Because the open access transformation is clearly anchored as a public policy goal and as an intention on the part of research funding and research performing organisations, all actors in the scientific landscape are called upon to take appropriate action in their respective fields of activity. Many aspects must be considered when converting a journal to open access – from academic freedom, through scientific control, sustainable and fair funding, and additional tasks in institutions, to calls for the redistribution of financial resources across institutions. However, the immediate criterion remains: Will the most comprehensive possible transformation to open access succeed?
References
- Bärwolff, T., Benz, M., Dreyer, M., Neufend, M., Kindling, M., Kirchner, A., & Schmidt, B. (2023). Open4DE landscape report. Open Research Office Berlin. https://doi.org/10.21428/986c5d43.bab38f02
- Biela, J., Stalla, M., Hohmann, L., & Holzer, A. C. (2024). Kartierung und Beschreibung der Open-Access-Dienste in Deutschland. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11121906.
- Bruch, C., Geschuhn, K., Hanig, K., Hillenkötter, K., Pampel, H., Schäffler, H., Scheiner, A., Scholze, F., Stanek, U., Timm, A., & Tullney, M. (2016). Empfehlungen zur Open-Access- Transformation. Strategische und praktische Verankerung von Open Access in der Informationsversorgung wissenschaftlicher Einrichtungen. Empfehlungen der Ad-hoc-AG Open-Access-Gold im Rahmen der Schwerpunktinitiative „Digitale Information“ der Allianz der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen. https://doi.org/10.3249/allianzoa.011
- German Physical Society (DPG) (2021). DPG position paper on the future of scientific publishing. https://www.dpg-physik.de/veroeffentlichungen/publikationen/stellungnahmen-der-dpg/wissenschaftssystem/pdf/dpg-positionspapier_publikationswesen_en_final.pdf
- German Research Foundation (DFG). (2018). Förderung von Informationsinfrastrukturen für die Wissenschaft [Funding information infrastructures for research]. https://www.dfg.de/resource/blob/173200/positionspapier-informationsinfrastrukturen.pdf
- German Research Foundation (DFG) | Working Group on Publications. (2022). Academic publishing as a foundation and area of leverage for research assessment – Challenges and fields of action. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6538163
- Mittermaier, B. (2021). Transformationsverträge – Stairway to Heaven oder Highway to Hell? Zeitschrift für Bibliothekskultur / Journal for Library Culture, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21428/1bfadeb6.d80f0652
- Mittermaier, B. (2025). Transformationsverträge sind eine Sackgasse: In Erinnerung an Irene Barbers (1966–2025). O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal Herausgeber VDB, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/6117
- Rothfritz, L., Herb, U., & Schmal, W. B. (2024) Trapped in transformative agreements? A multifaceted analysis of >1,000 contracts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20224
- Schenke, J., Stork, K. S., & Tullney, M. (2025). Das Diamond-Open-Access-Modell KOALA aus erwerbungsbibliothekarischer Sicht: Ein Auswertungsbericht. O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal, 12(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/6162
Further Reading
- Arning, U., Bargheer, M., Meinecke, I., Schobert, D., & Tobias, R. (2022). Open-Access-Transformation für Bücher: Die Rolle von institutionellen Verlagen und Publikationsdiensten. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6346234
- ESAC Initiative (2024, 11 August). Guidelines for transformative agreements. https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/guidelines-for-transformative-agreements,
- German Science and Humanities Council (WR). 2022. Recommendations on the transformation of academic publishing: Towards open access. https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/2022/9477-22_en
- Hacker, A., & Tullney, M. (2020). “Stell Dir vor, es ist 2020 und Open Access läuft immer noch nicht.“. https://doi.org/10.5446/49691
- Knoche, M. (2021). Raus aus den DEAL-Verträgen! Sieben Gründe für den Ausstieg. Aus Der Forschungsbibliothek Krekelborn. https://biblio.hypotheses.org/2598
- Oberländer, A., & Tullney, M. (2021). Gemeinschaftliche Open-Access-Finanzierung als Aufgabe für Bibliotheken. https://doi.org/10.5446/52895
- Pampel, H. (2021). Strategische und operative Handlungsoptionen für wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen zur Gestaltung der Open-Access-Transformation. Philosophische Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. https://doi.org/10.18452/22946
- Rösch, H., Geschuhn, K., Barbers, I., Bove, K., Pohlmann, T., & Satzinger, L. (2022). Open Access ermöglichen: Open Access-Transformation und Erwerbung in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken – ein praktischer Leitfaden. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6090208
- Schimmer, R., & Geschuhn, K. (2017). 3c. Open-Access-Transformation: Die Ablösung des Subskriptionswesens durch Open-Access-Geschäftsmodelle. In K. Söllner & B. Mittermaier (Eds.), Praxishandbuch Open Access (pp. 173–180). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110494068-020
- Schön, M., & Mittermaier, B. (2025). Empfehlungen zur Gestaltung des institutionellen Publikationskostenmonitorings. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14748772
- Šimukovič, E. (2024). Transformative agreements are a blind alley. Katina Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1146/katina-20241008-1
- Taubert, N., Sterzik, L., & Bruns, A. (2024). Mapping the German Diamond Open Access journal landscape. Minerva, 62(2), 193–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09519-7
- Ziegler, G.M., & Dirnagl, U. (2024). Warum die „Deal“-Verträge (k)ein Gewinn für die Wissenschaft sind. https://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/politik/warum-die-deal-vertraege-kein-gewinn-fuer-die-wissenschaft-sind-6595